Displaying significant pairwise comparisons to wild-type genotype (treated or untreated).
 

SamplesGeneLog2_fold_changeValuesP value
017079_WT-C-H vs. 017085_165-T-K POPTR_0002s25970 3.04111(7.90994 vs. 65.1088)  5e-05
017079_WT-C-H vs. 017087_165-T-H POPTR_0002s25970 3.32987(7.90994 vs. 79.5361)  0.0001
017079_WT-C-H vs. 017076_167-C-H POPTR_0002s25970 2.69027(7.90994 vs. 51.0535)  0.0001
017079_WT-C-H vs. 017077_167-C-J POPTR_0002s25970 3.19723(7.90994 vs. 72.5498)  5e-05
017091_WT-T-H vs. 017087_165-T-H POPTR_0002s25970 2.60952(13.0322 vs. 79.5361)  0.0003
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017074_165-C-J POPTR_0002s25970 2.97734(6.59271 vs. 51.9199)  0.0001
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017076_167-C-H POPTR_0002s25970 2.95307(6.59271 vs. 51.0535)  5e-05
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017077_167-C-J POPTR_0002s25970 3.46003(6.59271 vs. 72.5498)  5e-05
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017078_167-C-K POPTR_0002s25970 2.47701(6.59271 vs. 36.7044)  0.0001
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017085_165-T-K POPTR_0002s25970 3.30391(6.59271 vs. 65.1088)  5e-05
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017086_165-T-J POPTR_0002s25970 2.42852(6.59271 vs. 35.4913)  0.0002
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017087_165-T-H POPTR_0002s25970 3.59267(6.59271 vs. 79.5361)  5e-05
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017089_167-T-J POPTR_0002s25970 2.58709(6.59271 vs. 39.6147)  5e-05