Displaying significant pairwise comparisons to wild-type genotype (treated or untreated).
 

SamplesGeneLog2_fold_changeValuesP value
017079_WT-C-H vs. 017085_165-T-K POPTR_0004s05830 3.20481(2.65688 vs. 24.4973)  0.0002
017079_WT-C-H vs. 017087_165-T-H POPTR_0004s05830 3.54045(2.65688 vs. 30.9139)  5e-05
017081_WT-C-K vs. 017087_165-T-H POPTR_0004s05830 2.86805(4.23434 vs. 30.9139)  0.0002
017079_WT-C-H vs. 017074_165-C-J POPTR_0004s05830 2.80011(2.65688 vs. 18.505)  0.0003
017079_WT-C-H vs. 017076_167-C-H POPTR_0004s05830 2.85352(2.65688 vs. 19.2029)  0.00025
017079_WT-C-H vs. 017077_167-C-J POPTR_0004s05830 3.42527(2.65688 vs. 28.5419)  5e-05
017081_WT-C-K vs. 017077_167-C-J POPTR_0004s05830 2.75287(4.23434 vs. 28.5419)  5e-05
017091_WT-T-H vs. 017077_167-C-J POPTR_0004s05830 2.68492(4.43854 vs. 28.5419)  0.0001
017091_WT-T-H vs. 017085_165-T-K POPTR_0004s05830 2.46446(4.43854 vs. 24.4973)  0.00025
017091_WT-T-H vs. 017087_165-T-H POPTR_0004s05830 2.8001(4.43854 vs. 30.9139)  5e-05
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017074_165-C-J POPTR_0004s05830 3.15601(2.07603 vs. 18.505)  0.00025
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017076_167-C-H POPTR_0004s05830 3.20942(2.07603 vs. 19.2029)  0.0002
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017077_167-C-J POPTR_0004s05830 3.78118(2.07603 vs. 28.5419)  0.0001
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017085_165-T-K POPTR_0004s05830 3.56072(2.07603 vs. 24.4973)  0.0002
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017087_165-T-H POPTR_0004s05830 3.89635(2.07603 vs. 30.9139)  5e-05