Displaying significant pairwise comparisons to wild-type genotype (treated or untreated).
 

SamplesGeneLog2_fold_changeValuesP value
017079_WT-C-H vs. 017085_165-T-K POPTR_0018s11290 3.503(3.06137 vs. 34.7077)  5e-05
017079_WT-C-H vs. 017087_165-T-H POPTR_0018s11290 3.59571(3.06137 vs. 37.0112)  5e-05
017079_WT-C-H vs. 017074_165-C-J POPTR_0018s11290 3.15601(3.06137 vs. 27.288)  0.00025
017079_WT-C-H vs. 017075_165-C-K POPTR_0018s11290 3.14587(3.06137 vs. 27.0968)  0.00025
017079_WT-C-H vs. 017076_167-C-H POPTR_0018s11290 3.25019(3.06137 vs. 29.1287)  0.0002
017079_WT-C-H vs. 017077_167-C-J POPTR_0018s11290 3.66654(3.06137 vs. 38.8735)  0.00015
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017074_165-C-J POPTR_0018s11290 3.03316(3.3335 vs. 27.288)  5e-05
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017075_165-C-K POPTR_0018s11290 3.02302(3.3335 vs. 27.0968)  5e-05
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017076_167-C-H POPTR_0018s11290 3.12733(3.3335 vs. 29.1287)  5e-05
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017077_167-C-J POPTR_0018s11290 3.54368(3.3335 vs. 38.8735)  5e-05
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017085_165-T-K POPTR_0018s11290 3.38015(3.3335 vs. 34.7077)  5e-05
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017087_165-T-H POPTR_0018s11290 3.47285(3.3335 vs. 37.0112)  5e-05
017092_WT-T-J vs. 017089_167-T-J POPTR_0018s11290 2.81389(3.3335 vs. 23.4404)  0.0003